ARCHBISHOP GANSWAIN’S collateral damage.

 1. Archbishop Georg Ganswain.
     The short speech of Archbishop’s Ganswain had caused ripples all around the world. But  as of today the commentaries had suddenly stopped due to the difficulty in understanding what he said. But one headline read that Pope Francis was worried about what was said; that there were two Popes, one contemplative and the other an active one. Pope Francis has reason to worry because the Catholic Church cannot have two Popes. And if what Ganswain said was with the permission of Pope Benedict, then we only have one Pope and that is Pope Benedict.
     If Pope Francis knows his theology, which does not seem to be the case, then he should suspect that Pope Benedict is the Pope and that he is an anti-pope. To save his reputation, he should immediately send Pope Benedict to Cologne so he does not have to have a pain in the neck in the Vatican. As long as Pope Benedict stays in the Vatican, everybody will always compare the two and everyday the difference is becoming wider and wider. One is the epitome of orthodoxy while the other one is an  out right  heretic.  

 2. Malachy’s last Pope.
     Let us concentrate in only one point of contention; that is Archbishop Gawain’s mentioning St. Malachi’s list of Popes. It is evident that Pope Benedict believes in the list of Popes mentioned by St. Malachy, Bishop of Armagh. St. Malachy is a great saint who was highly praised by St. Bernard of Clairvaux. It is not wise to easily set aside the writings of Malachy because he is a saint. 
     Pope Benedict, in fact, based his choice of Papal name from the list of St. Malachy. Seeing that he is the second to the last Pope in the list, he chose Benedict. The Benedictines have the Olive branch all over their monasteries. Besides, St. Pope Gregory the Great prophesied that sometime during this time that is approaching the end of the list of Popes, a group of Benedictines will prepare the world to be a light in the present era of darkness. Thus he took the name ‘Gloria Olivae.’

     Basing the present situation  on St. Malachy’s prophesy, Pope Benedict would be ‘Gloria Olivae,’ which aptly described him. And Pope Francis would be ‘Peter Romanus’ which does not describe him. Archbishop Ganswain is hinting at this discrepancy. That there is something wrong; which he is not resolving and which he wants us readers to resolve by ourselves. 
     Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger is said to have consultations at least once a week. While Ratzinger had dwelt much in Benedictine monasticism and is acquainted with monks like St. Malachy, Pope John Paul seems to be acquainted with St. Grignion of Montfort author of ‘True devotion to Mary.’ In fact, Pope John Paul had made the total heroic consecration of his soul to the Blessed Virgin Mary according to Grignon’s formula.  
     John Paul II and the future Benedict XVI, knowing that they are the third and second to the last Popes in the list of St. Malachy, they must have discussed the topic. And the topic of the third, second to the last and the last Pope in the list must have come up. Pope John Paul II must have mentioned to Ratzinger that the last Pope is not going to be elected by a Conclave according to St. Grignon de Montfort.  That as at the beginning of Christianity, the last Pope will be appointed by Jesus Christ.
     That removes Pope Francis from the picture.  Because he is not appointed. He was elected. This alone settles and clarifies the confusion people have with regard to Ganswain’s statements. 
     We have two Popes. As of now, one was elected and the other is, also, elected. But the Pope today described as ‘Peter Romans’ is supposed to be appointed by Christ and not elected by a Conclave. So Pope Francis does not qualify to be ‘Peter Romanus’, though so many books and writings are insisting on it.  Besides, he would not fall under the description ‘Peter’ because he is disregarding completely all the promises he made immediately after his election, a vow that he recites before his papal name is announce to the public. His actuation are completely the opposite of St. Peter, the first Pope. He might be ‘Romanus’ because he is really Italian or Roman. But he has absolutely no resemblance with the ‘Peter’ the first Pope as described in the Gospel.

     Then Ganswain explains why Pope Benedict is still in the Vatican. Normally Pope Benedict should be returning to Cologne or Bavaria. Pope Francis would prefer to send him to Cologne because Benedict’s presence in the Vatican is too close for comfort. The two  are like black and white. But as Gawain was hinting; Pope Benedict is definitely ‘Peter’ and no one can doubt that. But if he went to Cologne, than the prophesy of Malachy should state ‘Peter Cologne’ which will further confuse people. So,  he had intentionally, stayed in Rome so that everybody can clearly see who is ‘Peter Romanus.’ He is the clone of St. Peter and he stays in Rome, in the Vatican. With that everything is clear.

     Some writers had expressed the opinion that St. Malachy’s list of Popes is just a medieval made list. Well, what if they are wrong. What if it is authentic. Christian humility is when you are very certain of what you are saying, you still believe the possibility that you can still make a mistake. This degree of humility Pope Francis does not have. He is so sure that adulterers, atheist and gays can go to heaven; when God, Himself, have said they were going to hell. 
     Having clarified Ganswain’s comment of St. Malachy, let us see other facts that confirms his belief in St. Malachy.   

3. Ganswain should have stated things clearer. Was his seemingly unintelligible statement intentional?  Yes. Ganswain knew that people without Faith would not understand anything anyway. But people with Faith would get it right away; that we have a Pope and an anti-pope. So what is new about that? Nothing. As we mentioned  before, the Catholic Church have had more than 40 anti-popes, so what else is new?
     
4. Ganswain was saying something deeper. It is based on the rich writings of the Church. Both the Old and New Testament had warned us on what the devil will do to destroy the Church; bad cardinals and bad bishops coming from bad seminarians and bad priests.  Well, it is so easy for one of those bad bishops and bad cardinal to be elected Pope. We have seen the state of seminaries and Cardinal Ratzinger, in his book ‘Ratzinger Report’ had already warned us of bad priests. It takes one Conclave to elect one of them. And we have seen how the progressives, described as the St Gallen Mafia, even from the beginning of Vatican II, had begun trying to sabotage the Church. How they failed in the five following Conclave but succeeded in the sixth. That is written in history. 

     The true Church had been warned by the prophets in the Old Testament, warned on Good Friday, warned in St. Pauls letter to the Thessalonians,  and warned in the Apocalypse of a bishop who would try to kill the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ. Judas pre-figured such a man. And we have seen several such persons in the history of the Church. But Divine Revelation tells us to expect him when we are running out of Popes. 
     Noticed already that as early as the 17th century, this man was awaited. At first no priests, bishop or cardinal is under suspicion. 
    The Marian Popes, from  Pope Pius X to Benedict XVI, were beyond suspicion. Most writers did not include Pope Francis among the Marian Popes because their books were written before Pope Francis. 
     Then St. Bridget’s ‘Scivias’ came to our notice because Pope Benedict raised her up as Doctor of the Church. A 12th century Benedictine nun raised up at this time. Why so long? Because she warned as of an anti-pope at this time. Benson in his nobel warned us, too. Then books on  prophecies, on the anti-christ and on the anti-popes begun appearing. Maybe, God’s way of focusing man’s attention  to up coming events. 
     
5. Then comes Mario Bergoglio. 
     The scenario was just right. We have cardinals, bishops and priest who are going to hell and dragging many souls with them……according to the Mother of God. The rest of the laymen are totally ignorant of Catholic truths and, therefore, in complete denial of reality, the punishment for infidelity. All states, prefigured by Pontius Pilate and the Roman empire, are out to destroy the Catholic Church. The few who know the truth had been silenced. All religions being from Satan, as St. Paul wrote, are doing Satan’s job. 
     In short, as mentioned in a previous post, the whole world is spiritually possessed by Satan. Signs?  Everybody is killing everybody, everybody is lying to everybody, everybody is preventing the few who are saving their souls from being saved and everybody is going to hell without knowing it. 
     With most people spiritually possessed by the devil, as on Good Friday, the possibility is very great that one of the possessed, like Judas, could be raised to the Papacy; specially when there is a known conspiracy to do so. And there is, since the beginning of Vatican II. That is history. 
     Those who want to be saved, what should they do? Don’t expect anyone to help you. There is no one left. You will have to help yourself. This post has become too long. Let us discuss it in another post.